Febuary 2020
250km/h, Under 250 Grams V2
This plane is a direct replacement of the version 1 plane which met an untimely demise, I was in general very happy with how the version 1 flew, but it was obvious I was reaching the limit of how fast I could push the airframe.
- The fuselage was too big and floppy causing increased wetted area and fluttering at high speed, this was because I was determined to build it from foam, a bad idea.
- The ESC was left outside the fuselage for cooling, however, it turned out that I didn’t have any cooling issues, so it was just creating extra drag.
- The wingspan was longer than it needed to be, on landing it was almost a glider; this is great for handling, but not for speed.
- It didn’t have FPV, this was a big one, it made it very hard to keep track of, hard to video, hard to analyse power consumption / RPM / speed.
The first change I made was to go with a 500mm wingspan, down from 600, this was an easy decision. I made the fuselage from lite balsa wood using the batteries as a former to keep the size to a minimum. All the electronics are the same, except the addition of a Runcam TX200 video transmitter and small FPV camera, and changing to a Matek F722 Flight controller that I put on a diet to reduce weight. I also ended up switching to a Xing 2207 2450kv motor, in search of a little bit more torque.
Most everything else is the same or very similar to the version 1, however, these small changes make a big difference.
Crash
Unfortunately, the next flight this plane had a very minor and stupid crash, I was flying around just doing some shakedown testing, not going for any high speeds, everything was going great. I came in for landing all was fine and then I hit my tripod. I never even saw it with how bad the FPV camera was on the plane. This was a very minor crash at less than 25kph, but as the wing detached it broke the insulation on some of the wiring, sending - 30v to most of the electronics.
Complete rebuild time.
Version 2.5
So, all of the electronics in the wing were dead, and the wing had been ripped off. I decided to just make a whole new wing.
For the new wing, as always, I wanted to make some changes. For a start, the plane had more than enough lift at slow speeds with the 500mm wingspan, so I figured going to 400mm was the only natural progression. This seemed like a ridiculous idea, but I couldn’t think of any real reason why not. I also wasn’t happy with the way I had the flight controller and other electronics wired.
I decided that instead of having all the power go through the flight controller, I would measure current draw at the ESC, and then power all other electronics from just one of the two 4s batteries. This both reduces wiring, and, since I’m not running electronics rated for 6s on 8s batteries, it makes the plane more reliable. However, it also means that I will only be measuring the current used by the motor and I will be drawing more power from one of the batteries. Measuring the power used by the motor only is a positive and a negative, I will be getting more accurate readings for when trying to optimise the power system, but I won’t know exactly how much of the battery capacity has been used. Using more power from one of the batteries is something I would normally shy away from, because normally this would mean having an unbalanced battery, however, since this battery is made of two separate batteries which will both be charged independently, it’s not actually really a problem.
While I was at it, I also upgraded the camera to a Caddx Eos 2 and I changed the flight controller to a Matek F411 wing, since I needed a replacement and this one is cheaper and slightly lighter than my cut down F722 wing.
First Flights:
This is the third flight of the plane, it was immediately obvious that it was quicker with the reduced wingspan, so I immediately jumped to trying new props.
This is with an APC 4.75x5.5 prop, I thought this would be about right based on the static loads of the old gemfan 4045BN prop and the new APC 4.75x5.5 prop, and although it was faster, it wasn't efficient.
For an increase of about 12kph (5%) (over the new wing with the gemfan prop) I was drawing about 200w more (35%), for this increase in power I was looking for more like a 40kph increase in speed, at least. This is telling me that the motor has gone from being underloaded to be overloaded, so the sweet spot is somewhere in between. the next prop I try will most likely be a 4.75x4.75 APC prop, or maybe a 5x5 cut down to 4.5x5. Based on this flight, I would guess that would be around the right load.
More Modifications
I wasn’t happy with the motor mount of the plane and some other general bits and pieces with the fuse, so I set out to fix them.
First Flight With New Aero:
This Is the first flight after doing the aero mods. The flight went ok, but I was significantly down on power, I was somewhat expecting this to be the case, as I moved from a 4.75x5.5 prop to a 4.75x4.75 prop, however, I dropped more power than I was expecting to, and I also lost RPM, which I was expecting to increase.
That all points to the batteries, and the cell voltages were reasonably low, however, I've since tested the batteries I was using and I was able to draw 35a static from them as I would expect.
For now I'm just going to assume it was some random anomaly, and focus on the other problem that I had this flight, which was the right yawing, I can only assume that is being caused by the camera and single aileron both being on the right wing, and that I didn't notice it before because the old motor mount was accidentally offset slightly to the left. I'll sort this by sanding a slight left curve into the fin, and hope that’s enough.
I think the biggest take away from this is that even with only 50% power I only went 20kph slower (presumably due to the aero improvements), and I'm very happy that I can now be disappointed when I see '230kph' in the OSD :)
New Record
There aren’t really any offical records for under 250g speed planes, the most offical one is probably speedcroco in Germany, other than that they are mostly scattered about the internet, one good collection is on FPVlab Personal Bests V5 (LEADERBOARDS), but even that doesn’t cover some of the latest records, and it doesn’t cover any of the non-FPV records.
The records I am most interested in are in descending order:
Fastest FPV aircraft - This is currently held by OMEGOOLIEBIRD with a heavily modified Vasa Models Fusion (aprox 4kg weight) at 425kph GPS one way, this is much higher than I am ever likely to reach under 250g, but its a nice thought.
Fastest under 250g aircraft - this is currently held by ‘Sascha’ with his all-carbon shrunk-down NanoBlade at 292kph with a 2 way average of a 200m course. This is becoming more and more within reach everyday, I hope to be breaking this soon.
Fastest under 250g FPV aircraft - there is not so much documentation on this, but, the fastest I have found seems to be Jesse Stroup at 262kph GPS one way with a Nano Goblin, however, this plane doesnt actually weigh under 250g, it weighs ~400g. This is however one of the fastest small models around, and it is a very highly contested record, so if the fastest one weighs 400g and can go 262kph, I’m willing to bet that nobody else has gone faster than that under 250g. To back this up, there are many other claimed ‘records’ from the last 2-3 years for FPV under 250g, and they are all around the 170-210kph mark, with quite a few being multicopters, and they are all GPS one way.
I hit 329kph groundspeed, and 267kph 2 way average.
This is faster than any record I have been able to find for FPV under 250g, and is potentially the fastest groundspeed under 250g.
I also catagorically beat my aim of 250kph under 250g
This was a very good combination.
According to the onboard RPM meter, I reached a pitch speed of ~ 270kph, so reaching 267kph shows that I had more thrust than I needed, since the sweet spot for pitch speed is between 110-120% of your airspeed, as I understand it. However, the RPM was perfect for this motor on 8s, so I want to try and keep the same load on upcoming flights.
Ultimately, I did 2 runs in each direction, and my best was 329kph downwind and 204kph upwind for an average of 267kph. The downwind run was in a slight dive, 5* according to the data logs, and still accelerating when I reached the edge of my flight site. The upwind leg was completely flat and level.
It was a very windy day, hence the massive difference between upwind and downwind speeds, but this made launches and landings easier, so it was welcome.
It also helped me reach an absurdly high groundspeed of 329kph (204mph), at least for a plane under 250g.
Continued Tests and retirement
This is a comparison video of a few different passes that I did with an APC 5x5 prop cut down to 4" vs a 5.25x6.25 prop cut down to 3.4".
Overall, they performed very similarly in terms of the data recorded, which is very interesting considering how different of a prop they are. at ~260kph they seem to put about the same load on the motor, and produce about the same thrust, however, presumably, they are producing that thrust in different ways. The 3.4x6.25 prop should be making a smaller column of air moving faster, compared to the 4x5 prop.
For this reason, I believe that with a more aerodynamic plane (which should be ready for flight soon) the 3.4x6.25 prop will be significantly better.
I beleive that this power system has a lot more left in it yet, hence the retirement of the plane (at least in terms of record runs).
Version 3 will be coming very soon, and 292+kph will be the goal.